The Ultimate Challenge
In today's data-driven world, one challenge is clear: how to understand and predict personal taste. For businesses using AI to improve shopping and recommendations, searching by taste is the hardest test, where technology meets the complexity of human preferences.
The Ultimate Challenge: Turning Subjective Taste Into Reliable Search. Photo by Tamara Gak on Unsplash
“The companies that master this ultimate challenge will not merely sell; they will connect with customers on a deeper, more intuitive level; anticipating desires, harmonizing choices, and turning the chaos of infinite options into the clarity of perfect fit.”
Taste is profoundly subjective. It shifts with context, mood, occasion, and cultural background. The wine a person craves after a long day may be different from one chosen for a celebratory dinner; the furniture that feels "right" for a modern loft might clash in a country cottage. These nuances confound even the most advanced algorithms, which are traditionally trained on fixed product attributes, click histories, or user demographics.
Modern personalization engines excel at learning patterns from past behavior, but taste resists being locked into static categories. Unlike technical specifications like color, size, and price, taste involves aesthetic harmony, emotional resonance, and situational appropriateness. Someone seeking a minimalist chair for their office might want a bold, textured sofa for their living room. Preferences are not only personal; they are context-dependent.
This variability makes building reliable search based on individual taste preferences one of the most formidable challenges in AI today.
The Cold Start Problem
The complexity multiplies when users jump between product categories. Research shows that user preferences are highly context-aware: location, time of day, company, and even weather can influence what feels appealing. A preference for earthy, rustic aesthetics in home decor doesn't necessarily translate to clothing, fragrance, or food choices.
AI-powered recommendation systems struggle with this fluidity. Collaborative filtering, where systems recommend products based on what similar users liked, works well when there's abundant behavioral data, but falters in capturing the subtle shifts in taste across domains. Content-based filtering, which suggests items with similar attributes to those a user has previously liked, risks becoming repetitive and fails to introduce complementary or contrasting choices that users might actually prefer.
Hybrid systems, combining both approaches, offer better results by balancing personalization with diversity. Yet even these systems require massive amounts of data and sophisticated tuning to avoid the "cold start" problem when new users or new products lack sufficient interaction history for accurate predictions.
The Pairing Problem
Beyond finding similar items, AI faces an even harder task: matching complementary products. Think of pairing chairs with tables, or wine with cheese. This requires understanding not just individual taste, but aesthetic and functional compatibility across categories.
Recent advances in machine learning are making headway. Algorithms now analyze transaction baskets, co-purchase patterns, and visual similarity to identify products frequently bought together or that "go well" aesthetically. For example, furniture retailers are deploying AI visual search tools that allow customers to upload a photo of a chair and receive suggestions for matching tables, rugs, or lighting—based on style, color palette, and spatial composition.
These systems use deep learning models trained on vast datasets of interior design images, learning to recognize patterns in texture, form, and color that signal compatibility. AI-powered platforms like Spacely, Deptho, and RoomGenius now offer visual search and product matching services, enabling users to discover furniture that fits their existing decor without scrolling through thousands of listings.
Yet matching complementary items is harder than matching similar ones. A minimalist chair might pair beautifully with a bold, contrasting table — not one that simply replicates the chair's aesthetic. AI must learn not just similarity, but harmony. This requires multimodal models that integrate visual, textual, and contextual data to understand design principles humans intuitively grasp.
The Breakthrough
The most promising advances are emerging from multimodal AI systems that combine images, text, and crucially human sensory annotations. A landmark example is the WineSensed dataset and the FEAST (Flavor Embeddings from Annotated Similarity & Text-Image) model, developed by researchers at the Technical University of Denmark.
WineSensed includes nearly 900,000 images of wine labels and over 800,000 user reviews, enriched with human-annotated flavor profiles from a large-scale sensory study. 256 participants used the "Napping" method—ranking wines by perceived taste similarity—generating more than 5,000 pairwise flavor annotations. This bridges the gap between subjective human experience and machine-readable data.
FEAST leverages pretrained models like CLIP to embed images and text, then aligns these embeddings with human taste annotations using non-metric multidimensional scaling and canonical correlation analysis. The result is a "flavor space" that captures not just coarse attributes like grape variety or alcohol content, but the nuanced, ineffable qualities of human flavor perception.
The implications extend far beyond wine. This approach demonstrates that incorporating explicit sensory data, rather than relying solely on clicks or purchases, enables AI to model subjective experience more faithfully. Similar methods are now being applied in food innovation, with platforms like Tastewise and AI Palette analyzing billions of data signals from menus, reviews, and social media to predict flavor trends and personalize recipes.
In furniture and interior design, AI is learning to predict aesthetic compatibility by analyzing design principles embedded in millions of curated images. These systems identify patterns in lighting, material texture, spatial composition, and color harmony features where design differences between human and AI-generated spaces are most pronounced.
Practical Challenges
Despite progress, significant challenges remain. Building taste-based search requires vast, high-quality datasets, often scarce in niche markets. Human sensory annotation is expensive and time-consuming; scaling it to millions of products is impractical without clever hybrid approaches that combine small sets of expert annotations with large-scale behavioral data.
Data privacy is another hurdle. Effective personalization depends on collecting detailed user behavior, raising concerns about compliance with regulations like GDPR and CCPA. Businesses must balance the hunger for data with transparent privacy policies and robust data governance frameworks.
The cold start problem persists: new users and new products lack the interaction history needed for accurate recommendations. Context-aware systems, which incorporate environmental factors like location, time, and mood, offer partial solutions but introduce complexity and data sparsity issues.
The Business Impact
For companies, solving the taste problem unlocks significant value. AI personalization is driving revenue growth of 40% or more for brands that get it right. By delivering hyper-personalized experiences with dynamic, real-time recommendations that adapt to individual preferences and situational context, retailers can boost conversion rates, average order values, and customer loyalty.
Strategic placement of complementary product recommendations on product pages, in cart popups, or as bundles can significantly increase basket sizes. Visual search and augmented reality tools allow customers to visualize how furniture fits their homes, reducing return rates and enhancing satisfaction.
Yet the path forward requires investment. Training multimodal AI models like FEAST is within reach for most research labs and advanced analytics teams, with compute costs ranging from hundreds to a few thousand dollars depending on scale. The bigger challenge is assembling the right data: multimodal datasets combining images, text, and human annotations.
Toward Personal Discovery
Developing truly personal, taste-based search is a blend of behavioral science, machine learning, and continuous experimentation. Sophisticated algorithms and deep learning pipelines are making progress, but the inherent subjectiveness of taste means it will always stay one step ahead of technology.
As systems grow smarter by integrating contextual cues, sensory annotations, and cross-category logic, the future of discovery will blend the art of human taste with the precision and scale of artificial intelligence. This journey is not just about finding products, it is about curating experiences, enhancing satisfaction, and making every search a step toward personal expression.
The companies that master this ultimate challenge will not merely sell; they will connect with customers on a deeper, more intuitive level; anticipating desires, harmonizing choices, and turning the chaos of infinite options into the clarity of perfect fit.
*Sources and further readings for this insights article here!
HOW TO: Create unique personalized search experiences at each search query
Thalius Search™ bridges keyword clarity, transparent neural embeddings, and interactive discovery, making product search feel natural, intuitive and enjoyable.
Thalius Taste Finder lets users curate their personal taste profiles, enabling discovery of complementary products that share the same underlying style or aesthetic, seamlessly extending personal taste to new product categories at each search query.
By integrating our API with your existing e-commerce platform, you future-proof your site for the agent era, letting shoppers and their digital agents instantly discover what makes your brand unique.
Connect with Thalius to see a live demo tailored to your tech stack, so your brand stands out, in every search.
